Stevens v. Bank of America - Rules 9.030 & 9.130

By Brian Willis on June 11, 2010 10:29 AM | | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
Appeal of Trial Court's order granting Motion for Summary Judgment was not timely as (1) counterclaims were not adjudicated in Summary Judgment Order and (2) counterclaims were not separate and distinct from the claims disposed of on Summary Judgment. Citing Jensen v. Whetstine, 985 So.2d 1218, 1220 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008).


Tags:

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Stevens v. Bank of America - Rules 9.030 & 9.130.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://reporter.floridacivpro.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/196

Leave a comment

Search the Florida Rules Decisions

Search the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure

Contact the Authors

Brian Willis, Florida Lawyer, Business and Real Estate Attorney  Brian Willis
 Attorney Bio
 LinkedIn
 Email Brian



Jason Baruch, Florida Lawyer, Business Attorney  Jason Baruch
 Attorney Bio
 Email Jason



Brian and Jason provide legal services to local, national and international clients with business and real estate related legal issues in the Tampa Bay area and across Florida. We always appreciate case referrals from our local and out of state readers. Please contact us at the links above.

Share & Follow


Twitter (follow us on Twitter)
RSS Button (click for RSS feed)


About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Brian Willis published on June 11, 2010 10:29 AM.

Slow Civ Pro Season was the previous entry in this blog.

Flores v. Riscomp Industries, Inc. - 3d DCA May 26, 2010 is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.01