Flores v. Riscomp Industries, Inc. - 3d DCA May 26, 2010

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
This slip and fall Plaintiff struggled with her Complaint, amending it three times after the initial filing. Nevertheless, through all of the amendments, the substantive factual allegations remained unchanged.  The Third Amended Complaint was filed, however, after the statute of limitations ran on the underlying cause of action and the trial court dismissed the case with prejudice.  On appeal, the Third DCA overturned the dismissal finding that the amended complaint related back to the original pleading, which was timely filed, pursuant to Rule 1.190, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.  The Court reiterated that a pleading relates back if "the original pleading gives fair notice of the general fact situation out of which the claim or defense arises." Citing Kiehl v. Brown, 546 So.2d 18, 19 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).


0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Flores v. Riscomp Industries, Inc. - 3d DCA May 26, 2010.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://reporter.floridacivpro.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/197

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Brian Willis published on June 14, 2010 11:16 AM.

Stevens v. Bank of America - Rules 9.030 & 9.130 was the previous entry in this blog.

COOPER v. TOWN OF JUPITER et al., 35 Fla. L. Weekly D1335a (Fla. 4th DCA June 16, 2010) is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.01