CHRISTIAN N. ZARRA et al. v. KEN BURKE, 35 Fla. L. Weekly D436a (Fla. 2d DCA February 24, 2010)

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

In this class action case, plaintiffs sued the clerk of court for charging "a reopen fee for cases previously reported as disposed of."  The trial court dismissed the complaint with prejudice for failure to state a cause of action after two amendments because of "pleading deficiencies."  The trial court reasoned that a "re-opening fee" could be charged in such cases if one followed the "Summary Reporting System Manual."  The Second District affirmed, with a special concurrence requesting clarity from the legislature and judiciary on this issue.

CHRISTIAN N. ZARRA et al. v. KEN BURKE, 35 Fla. L. Weekly D436a (Fla. 2d DCA February 24, 2010)

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: CHRISTIAN N. ZARRA et al. v. KEN BURKE, 35 Fla. L. Weekly D436a (Fla. 2d DCA February 24, 2010).

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://reporter.floridacivpro.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/187

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Jason Baruch published on March 5, 2010 6:51 PM.

Ramle Int'l Corp. v. The Greens Condo. Assoc., No. 3D08-2834 (Fla. 3d DCA Feb. 10, 2010) was the previous entry in this blog.

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INS. CO. v. PETER F. MERKLE, M.D., P.A., 35 Fla. L. Wkly D620a (Fla. 4th DCA Mar. 17, 2010) is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.01