Hess Corp. v. Denise Grillasca & Kelly Mayzik, 34 Fla. L. Wkly D2629b (Fla. 2d DCA Dec. 23, 2009)

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

In this consumer class action case, the trial court certified a class against gas stations for failing to provide notice of a temporary hold on customers’ bank accounts after a debit transaction.  The appellate court reversed because, under Rule 1.220(b), there were individualized differences among the members of the putative class.  The differences included the fact that some customers 1) received notice of the hold and/or 2) incurred damages in the form of overdraft charges, while others did not.

 

Hess Corp. v. Denise Grillasca & Kelly Mayzik, 34 Fla. L. Wkly D2629b (Fla. 2d DCA Dec. 23, 2009)

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Hess Corp. v. Denise Grillasca & Kelly Mayzik, 34 Fla. L. Wkly D2629b (Fla. 2d DCA Dec. 23, 2009).

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://reporter.floridacivpro.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/178

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Jason Baruch published on January 5, 2010 1:56 PM.

News for the New Year was the previous entry in this blog.

Toward a More “Convenient” Standard of Review in Cases Involving Forum Non Conveniens Issues is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.01