Williamson v. Bradford, 34 Fla. L. Wkly D2472a (Fla. 1st DCA Nov. 30, 1990)

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

In this case, the court entered a partial summary judgment on a counterclaim for monetary damages while the plaintiff’s affirmative claim was still pending.  By including the phrase “for which let execution issue” in the judgment, the trial court attempted to permit the defendant to begin collection proceedings.  The appellate court held that this was error as a matter of law and reversed, citing Millennium Group I, L.L.C. v. Attorney's Title Ins. Fund, Inc., 847 So. 2d 1115 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).

 

Williamson v. Bradford, 34 Fla. L. Wkly D2472a (Fla. 1st DCA Nov. 30, 1990)

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Williamson v. Bradford, 34 Fla. L. Wkly D2472a (Fla. 1st DCA Nov. 30, 1990).

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://reporter.floridacivpro.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/172

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Jason Baruch published on December 9, 2009 5:41 PM.

Roth v. Bank of America, 34 Fla. L. Wkly D2383 (Fla. 2d DCA Nov. 18, 2008) was the previous entry in this blog.

Judgment and Decrees 2010 Interest Rates is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.01