Roth v. Bank of America, 34 Fla. L. Wkly D2383 (Fla. 2d DCA Nov. 18, 2008)

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
In another foreclosure case gone wrong, which is becoming a trend in the appellate decisions of late, the Second DCA overturns the trial court's entry of Summary Judgment where the hearing transcript "does not reflect that the trial court considred the affidavit of [a third party] that called into question the validity of the note and mortgage."

The decision does not address the trial court's order, but, presumably, the Summmary Judgment Order also did not address the affidavit. 

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Roth v. Bank of America, 34 Fla. L. Wkly D2383 (Fla. 2d DCA Nov. 18, 2008).

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://reporter.floridacivpro.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/171

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Brian Willis published on December 2, 2009 10:21 PM.

ST. JOHNS INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CO. v. DAVID T. ALBANEZE, 34 Fla. L. Weekly D2354a (1st DCA Nov. 13, 2009) was the previous entry in this blog.

Williamson v. Bradford, 34 Fla. L. Wkly D2472a (Fla. 1st DCA Nov. 30, 1990) is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.01