ST. JOHNS INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CO. v. DAVID T. ALBANEZE, 34 Fla. L. Weekly D2354a (1st DCA Nov. 13, 2009)

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

In this non-compete case, the trial court denied a motion for temporary injunction on the basis that the restrictive covenant did not survive the expiration of the employment agreement because the post-agreement employment relationship "was not formalized in a written document."

The appellate court reversed, holding that the movant had established a substantial likelihood of success on the merits based upon a provision in the agreement that contemplated employment "in the absence of a written agreement."

ST. JOHNS INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CO. v. DAVID T. ALBANEZE, 34 Fla. L. Weekly D2354a (1st DCA Nov. 13, 2009)

 

 

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: ST. JOHNS INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CO. v. DAVID T. ALBANEZE, 34 Fla. L. Weekly D2354a (1st DCA Nov. 13, 2009).

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://reporter.floridacivpro.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/160

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Jason Baruch published on November 24, 2009 1:36 PM.

Palm Beach Polo Holdings, Inc. v. Equestrian Club Estates Property Owners Assoc., Inc. (Fla. 4th DCA Nov. 18, 2009) was the previous entry in this blog.

Roth v. Bank of America, 34 Fla. L. Wkly D2383 (Fla. 2d DCA Nov. 18, 2008) is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.01