Jose Milton vs. John Reyes, 34 Fla. L. Wkly D2050a (Fla 3d DCA Oct. 7, 2009)

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

In this personal injury case, the trial court denied plaintiff's motion for attorneys' fees pursuant to an offer of judgment because it did not include a certificate of service, although it was accompanied by a “Notice of Service of Proposal for Settlement" that did in fact include a proper certificate of service.  Citing Campbell v. Goldman, 959 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 2007), the appellate court held that proposals for settlement are in derogation of the common law and therefore must be strictly construed.  Because Rule 1.442 requires that the proposal itself contain a certificate of service, the order denying the fee award was affirmed.

Jose Milton vs. John Reyes, 34 Fla. L. Wkly D2050a (Fla 3d DCA Oct. 7, 2009)

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Jose Milton vs. John Reyes, 34 Fla. L. Wkly D2050a (Fla 3d DCA Oct. 7, 2009).

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://reporter.floridacivpro.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/91

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Jason Baruch published on October 23, 2009 5:38 PM.

Tarik, Inc. v. NNN Acquisitions, Inc., 34 Fla. L. Wkly D1977 (Fla. 4th DCA Sept. 30, 2009) was the previous entry in this blog.

Buck v. Chin, 34 Fla. L. Wkly. D2100 (Fla. 3d DCA Oct. 14, 2009) is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.01