Bothe v. Hansen (U.S. Oct. 05, 2009)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED1. Florida's intermediate appellate courts decide over 80% of the appeals they hear with per curiam orders issued without opinions and the losing party has no right to seek further review of these summary dispositions by the Florida Supreme Court. Does this procedure deny the losing party due process or the equal protection of the laws?
2. Is an appellant denied procedural due process when Florida's Second District Court of Appeal, a court of last resort, refuses to include in the record and consider evidence relevant to the her claim of error by the lower court?
The Petition was brought by Sarasota attorney Carl J. Robie, III and Massachusetts attorney Dennis P. Derrick. In opposition was another Sarasota attorney Susan J. Silverman.
Ironically the U.S. Supreme Court's opinion stated in full: "The petition for writ of certiorari is denied."
I am not surprised that the Supreme Court declined to wade into this issue, but I think it is a problem that needs to be addressed at the State level. The Florida Supreme Court's docket is presently dominated by death penalty cases, leaving a gap in authoritative Florida Supreme Court decisions on many issues.
The briefs are not publicly available, but I will post them here if they are sent to me.
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Bothe v. Hansen (U.S. Oct. 05, 2009) .
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://reporter.floridacivpro.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/34


(follow us on Twitter)
(click for RSS feed)
Leave a comment