Bauer v. Dilib et al., 2009 WL 2949296 (Fla. 4th DCA Sept. 16, 2009)

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

In this non-compete case, an employer obtained an injunction against its former employee and her new employer for aiding and abetting a breach of a restrictive covenant.  The trial court taxed attorneys' fees against the new employer under Section 542.335(1)(k), Fla. Stat.  The appellate court reversed, holding that the statute authorized a fee award only against the party to the restrictive covenant (the former employee).  Because there was no independent contractual or statutory basis to award fees against the new employer, the fee award was invalid.

Bauer v. Dilib et al., 2009 WL 2949296 (Fla. 4th DCA Sept. 16, 2009)

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Bauer v. Dilib et al., 2009 WL 2949296 (Fla. 4th DCA Sept. 16, 2009).

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://reporter.floridacivpro.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/35

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Jason Baruch published on October 9, 2009 3:48 PM.

Bothe v. Hansen (U.S. Oct. 05, 2009) was the previous entry in this blog.

Challenger Investment Group, LC v. Jones, et. al., 34 Fla. L. Wkly. D1990 (Fla. 3d DCA Sept. 30 2009) is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.01