Wells Fargo Bank v. Lupica, 34 Fla.L. Weekly D1866 (Fla. 5th DCA Sept. 8, 2009)

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
In this duo of cases, the 5th DCA stated that an Order is not final until it is (1) written, (2) signed, and (3) filed with the clerk of the trial court.  Here the written order was stamped by the Judge, but not sent to the Clerk for entry.  As such, the DCA lacked jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 9.110(b)

The Court takes the further opportunity to gently chastise the trial courts in both cases, stating: "Some basis for the ruling would be instructive both to the parties and this Court." Ouch.  The 5th DCA is obviously getting frustrated with the foreclosure cases it is seeing.




0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Wells Fargo Bank v. Lupica, 34 Fla.L. Weekly D1866 (Fla. 5th DCA Sept. 8, 2009).

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://reporter.floridacivpro.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/30

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Brian Willis published on September 22, 2009 9:20 PM.

Arguelles v. City of Orlando, 34 Fla. L. Weekly D1869 (Fla. 5th DCA Sept. 11, 2009) was the previous entry in this blog.

4UORTHO, LLC et al. v. Practice Partners, Inc. et al., 34 Fla. L. Wkly D1847a (Fla. 4th DCA Sept. 9, 2009) is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.01