De Armand l. Hull vs. The Lending House, Inc., 34 Fla. L. Wkly D1815b (Fla. 3d DCA Sept. 2, 2009)

By Jason Baruch on September 18, 2009 2:51 PM | | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

In this case, defendant moved to vacate a default on the basis that plaintiff improperly used substitute service to serve the complaint.  The trial court denied the motion.  The appellate court affirmed, holding that defendant's continued inaccessibility at his residence obviated the need for defendant to be served personally.

De Armand l. Hull vs. The Lending House, Inc., 34 Fla. L. Wkly D1815b (Fla. 3d DCA Sept. 2, 2009)


Tags:

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: De Armand l. Hull vs. The Lending House, Inc., 34 Fla. L. Wkly D1815b (Fla. 3d DCA Sept. 2, 2009).

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://reporter.floridacivpro.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/28

Leave a comment

Search the Florida Rules Decisions

Search the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure

Contact the Authors

Brian Willis, Florida Lawyer, Business and Real Estate Attorney  Brian Willis
 Attorney Bio
 LinkedIn
 Email Brian



Jason Baruch, Florida Lawyer, Business Attorney  Jason Baruch
 Attorney Bio
 Email Jason



Brian and Jason provide legal services to local, national and international clients with business and real estate related legal issues in the Tampa Bay area and across Florida. We always appreciate case referrals from our local and out of state readers. Please contact us at the links above.

Share & Follow


Twitter (follow us on Twitter)
RSS Button (click for RSS feed)


About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Jason Baruch published on September 18, 2009 2:51 PM.

Suntrust Bank, Inc. v. Hodges, 12 So.3d 1278 (Fla. 4th DCA July 22, 2009) was the previous entry in this blog.

Arguelles v. City of Orlando, 34 Fla. L. Weekly D1869 (Fla. 5th DCA Sept. 11, 2009) is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.01