Arguelles v. City of Orlando, 34 Fla. L. Weekly D1869 (Fla. 5th DCA Sept. 11, 2009)

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
Pursuant to Rule 1.420(e), it was reversible error for Court to dismiss lawsuit for lack of prosecution a mere 31-days after required notice of no activity.


0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Arguelles v. City of Orlando, 34 Fla. L. Weekly D1869 (Fla. 5th DCA Sept. 11, 2009).

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://reporter.floridacivpro.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/29

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Brian Willis published on September 22, 2009 9:14 PM.

De Armand l. Hull vs. The Lending House, Inc., 34 Fla. L. Wkly D1815b (Fla. 3d DCA Sept. 2, 2009) was the previous entry in this blog.

Wells Fargo Bank v. Lupica, 34 Fla.L. Weekly D1866 (Fla. 5th DCA Sept. 8, 2009) is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.01