4UORTHO, LLC et al. v. Practice Partners, Inc. et al., 34 Fla. L. Wkly D1847a (Fla. 4th DCA Sept. 9, 2009)

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

In this non-compete case, the trial court entered an order enjoining defendants from soliciting plaintiffs' "current or prospective clients" who practiced in the area of orthopedic medicine.  The order did not specify the duration of the restriction.  The Fourth District reversed and remanded, holding that Rule 1.610(c) requires that the order define the referenced "clients" more specifically and that a time restriction be specified in the injunction.

4UORTHO, LLC et al. v. Practice Partners, Inc. et al., 34 Fla. L. Wkly D1847a (Fla. 4th DCA Sept. 9, 2009)

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: 4UORTHO, LLC et al. v. Practice Partners, Inc. et al., 34 Fla. L. Wkly D1847a (Fla. 4th DCA Sept. 9, 2009).

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://reporter.floridacivpro.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/31

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Jason Baruch published on September 25, 2009 1:27 PM.

Wells Fargo Bank v. Lupica, 34 Fla.L. Weekly D1866 (Fla. 5th DCA Sept. 8, 2009) was the previous entry in this blog.

Rule Updates is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.01