Strategic Empowerment v. South Dade Realty, Inc., 34 Fla. L. Wkly 1557 (Fla. 3d DCA July 29, 2009)

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
An unsworn complaint, a lis pendens signed by counsel alone, and an answer and affirmative defenses filed by the defendant, "did not satisfy even the most rudimentary of conditions for entry of a mandatory injunction without notice to the adverse party" pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1.610 and We're Assocs. VI Ltd. P'ship v. Curzon Dev. Corp., 738 So.2d 440, 442 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).  In this commercial real estate case, the court treated Strategic Empowerment's request for an interlocutory order dissolving a lis pendens as a request for an injunction subject to the requirements of Rule 1.610.

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Strategic Empowerment v. South Dade Realty, Inc., 34 Fla. L. Wkly 1557 (Fla. 3d DCA July 29, 2009).

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://reporter.floridacivpro.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/20

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Brian Willis published on August 16, 2009 12:10 PM.

Jorge Manzano et al. v. Franco Nicoletti et al., 34 Fla. L. Wkly D1435b (Fla. 3d DCA July 15, 2009) was the previous entry in this blog.

SALINAS v. ORLANDO MEDINA et al., 34 Fla. L. Wkly D1582a (Fla. 3d DCA August 5, 2009) is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.01