Reconsideration or Rehearing: Is There a Difference?

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
James Wyman explains in the most recent edition of the Florida Bar Journal that: "while the rules of civil procedure themselves do not authorize motions for rehearing directed to nonfinal orders, a trial court does have the inherent authority to reconsider and alter or retract such orders prior to the entry of final judgment. Rather than constituting a motion for rehearing under Rule 1.530, a motion directed to a nonfinal order is actually a “motion for reconsideration” based upon this inherent and discretionary authority of the trial court.6 Despite this distinct and well-established basis for reconsideration of interlocutory orders, there still exists confusion among many practitioners about the differences between reconsideration and rehearing."

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Reconsideration or Rehearing: Is There a Difference?.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://reporter.floridacivpro.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/8

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Brian Willis published on June 4, 2009 10:44 PM.

Cabrera v. Pazos (Fla. 2d DCA March 2, 2006) was the previous entry in this blog.

More Coverage on the New Complex Litigation Rule 1.201 (Florida Bar News) is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.01